Springfield armory m1a socom accuracy
When I hunt with my M1A, I use polymer-tipped expanding bullets or copper bullets. Light magnum loads make the action work too hard and can bend an operating rod. You can shoot soft points in the M1A but the lead tips get dinged up and will gunk up the works. I stay away from soft point bullets or light magnum loaded ammo. There has been a lot written on the differences between these calibers and I’ll hold my own with any caliber-ophile suffice to say I have used both in the M1A without issue. The M1A Standard from Springfield is a reproduction of that classic M14 rifle retrofitted for civilian use. It is accurate, offers fast follow-up shots, it is extremely reliable, and it takes optics relatively easily. The fact is, the M14 is a really excellent example of the quintessential wood and steel battle rifle. It’s seen service in Iraq and Afghanistan and that says a lot for a rifle design that’s over 60 years old. The M14 in its new roles goes by a variety of names including the M25 by the Army and Navy and the M39 by the Marines. The M14 turned out to be a better sniper rifle than battle rifle and is still in service as a designated marksman rifle for the U.S. Then the Army had a sort of an epiphany: What about the M14? The Army transformed the M14 into the X21M sniper rifle. Winchester and Remington bolt-action rifles designed for hunting were initially outfitted with sporting goods store optics. What was discovered during the Vietnam War was that there was a real need for sniper rifles. You would think the M14 would be a footnote in the book of U.S. In was adopted in 1959 and by 1964 it was replaced with the M16. The M14 also had one of the shortest service lives of any U.S. Suffice to say the M14 was the epitome of the classic wood and steel battle rifle. The M16 was the future, but that’s a different story. If you think about it, the M14 was an old wood-and-steel, combat-rifle design that was optimized with a detachable-box magazine and chambered in a more recoil friendly round. It was also long, over 44 inches, and wasn’t as maneuverable in the dense jungle environment. They hated the M14 for its weight, which was close to 11 pounds loaded. The thing about the M14 that my buddies mostly recall is they liked it for its reliability, accuracy and power. At least that’s what some of my pals say who were deployed to Vietnam in the early 1960s.
#Springfield armory m1a socom accuracy full#
In full auto mode, the M14 was nearly uncontrollable, which is why the M14 was mostly used in semi-automatic mode. Well, maybe the selective-fire feature wasn’t so much of an improvement. Chambered in 7.62 NATO and featuring a detachable 20-round magazine, the M14 offered more firepower, faster reloads and a selective-fire feature. The M14 was a significant improvement over the M1 Garand, the rifle it replaced.